Legal Aid and Defender Association

Legal Aid and Defender Association

Monday, May 14, 2012

Legal Aid and Defender Association, Inc. (LAD) Small Claims Courts Workshops





Legal Aid and Defender Association, Inc. (LAD) conducted the first in a series of three free workshops on small claims courts April 24 at LAD headquarters, 613 Abbott St.
 
The workshop was designed to teach residents of Wayne County to represent themselves in the small claims division of 36th District Court in Detroit and collect money judgments. Michelle Johnson, supervising attorney of LAD's Detroit-Wayne office, conducted the workshop.


"Small claims court is a judicial process in district courts that allows for settling money dispute of $3,000 or less," Johnson said.


Although plaintiffs cannot be represented by attorneys in small claims courts, Johnson told attendees at the workshop, "It is always advisable that you discuss your particular circumstances with your attorney before going to court."


LAD's second workshop, for Macomb County residents, will be held Tuesday, May 15 at Clinton/Macomb Library, 40900 Romeo Plank Road, Clinton Township.


The third workshop, for Oakland County residents, will be held Wednesday, June 20 at Oakland County Law Library, 1200 N. Telegraph Road, Pontiac.


Registration for both workshops will begin at 3:30 p.m. The workshops themselves will begin promptly at 4:00. For further information, contact Gina Polley, deputy chief counsel of LAD's Civil Law Group, at (313) 967-5638 or GPolley@ladadetroit.org.

Friday, May 11, 2012

THE FIGHT FOR QUALITY INDIGENT DEFENSE IN MICHIGAN!

Where are we in the fight for quality indigent defense in Michigan…?
…On the brink of what could be major steps towards the day when indigent defendants charged with crimes can count on having a public defender that will betrained and accountable!
The National Legal Aid & Defender Association (“NLADA”) released a June 2008 evaluation of Michigan’s indigent defense system, and found that “the state fails to provide competent representation to those who cannot afford counsel in its criminal courts”

On October 13, 2011, at the urging of numerous legal and community leaders, Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder issued a historic Executive Order establishing the state’s first Indigent Defense Advisory Commission (“Commission”) to make recommendations to the Governor and the Legislature for “improvements to the system of providing legal representation for indigent criminal defendants.”
After several meetings, the 14-member Commission has issued nine recommendations,and endorses the establishment of a permanent Commission that will promulgate and implement rules requiringstate-wide standards and enforcement, and provide a greater assurance of quality legal representationfor poor defendants.

Now we need the Legislature to introduce and pass a bill that will not only create a permanent Commission, but arm it with the tools necessary to implement all of the recommendations offered by the Advisory Commission. Wayne County, home to the State’s largest city, Detroit, is also Michigan’s most populated county (with 1,820,584 residents); and is most densely populated (with 2,974 residents in each of its 614 square miles). Richly diverse, it boasts a population that is 52.3 percent white, 40.5 percent African American, 5.2 percent Hispanic/Latino, and 2.5 percent Asian.
Wayne County can also be viewed as “ground zero” for many of the problems that face indigent defenders in Michigan. Wayne County residents constitute a plurality of Michigan’s prison population.

According to the Urban Institute’sReport on Prison Reentry in Michigan, “Approximately one-third (34 percent) of prisoners released to parole in 2003 retuned to Wayne County – a county that already faces greater economic and social disadvantage than many other counties throughout the state. For example, the percentage of families living below the federal poverty level in Wayne County is 72 percent higher than the statewide average, and the Part I crime rate is 57 percent higher in Wayne County. The majority (80 percent) of prisoners released to parole in Wayne County returned to Detroit, where the unemployment rate in 2000 was more than double what is was in poverty.  Among the prisoners released to parole in Wayne County, 41 percent returned to eight zip codes – all of which are in Detroit. Most of those eight zip codes display high levels of economic and social disadvantage”

So, what’s the problem?

 One of the problems in Wayne County is that the community is not aware of – nor has it been engaged in – the struggle for quality indigent defense. Most people do not see it as a pressing – or even personal – problem. Consequently, they have not demanded reform, nor held their elected officials accountable for the mess we’re in!
However, when one thinks about it, almost everyone in Wayne County has been touched – or has a family members or friend who has been touched – by the indigent defense system. Just look at Wayne County’s prisoner reentry return rate! We all have a stake in the outcome of this process.



Al (BJ) Williams

Thursday, April 5, 2012

SNYDER SIGNS PRISONER RE-ENTRY BILLS



SNYDER SIGNS PRISONER RE-ENTRY BILLS
Gov. Rick Snyder signed legislation requiring the Department od Corrections to assist prisoners in obtaining identification documents, aiming to improve chances for employment upon their release.
The bill requires DOC to provide prisoners released at the end of their sentence or on parole with prisoner identification cards. The Department of State must accept these cards as one of several identification documents required to obtain a state ID card or driver's license.

This Legislative package included four bills:
2011 House Bill 4074: Facilitate ex-cons getting state IDs
to require prisoners to make an effort to assemble the documents needed to get a state identification card upon release, and require the Department of Corrections and the Secretary of State to help them get the documents and the card. Also, to issue all prisoners with a photo identification card when they are released.
2011 House Bill 4075: Facilitate ex-cons getting state IDs
to require the Secretary of State to accept a Michigan prison prisoner identification card as one of the identification documents that allows a person to get a state ID card, and give the Secretary of State access to the Department of Corrections prisoner biography database for purposes of making it easier for ex-prisoners to get a state ID card.
2011 House Bill 4076: Facilitate ex-cons getting state IDs
to require the Secretary of State to accept a Michigan prison prisoner identification card as one of the identification documents that allows a person to get a drivers license, and give the Secretary of State access to the Department of Corrections prisoner biography database for purposes of making it easier for ex-prisoners to get a state drivers license (or ID card).
2011 House Bill 4077: Facilitate ex-cons getting state IDs
to require new prisoners to be given a form that explains the importance upon release of getting either a drivers license or a state ID, describes the documents needed to do so, and includes a request that the person get the documents and give them to the Department of Corrections, which will retain them in his or her file.

All Signed by Gov. Rick Snyder on February 21, 2012.

LEGAL AID ADVANCING JUSTICE INITIATIVE: Consent Agreement! What would Coleman Young Say?

LEGAL AID ADVANCING JUSTICE INITIATIVE: Consent Agreement! What would Coleman Young Say?: Consent Agreement/ Emergency Manager! Detroit has been here before? Today, as Detroit struggles with an escalating deficit of $300 ...

Consent Agreement! What would Coleman Young Say?




Consent Agreement/ Emergency Manager! Detroit has been here before?

Today, as Detroit struggles with an escalating deficit of $300 million and a consent agreement, the intriguing question on the minds of many is what would Mayor Coleman Alexander Young do if he were Mayor of Detroit right now?

          In 1981, the city of Detroit and then Mayor Coleman Alexander Young faced a budget deficit of $133 million, an amount that today translates to roughly $331 million. According to Tim Kiska, WWJ editor and Historian in political journalism, wrote, “We forget that the 1980’s was a difficult time – even more difficult, on some levels, than what we faced since 2008. Unemployment hit the double-digit mark in February 1980, and stayed there until 1985, peaking at 16.8 percent in December of 1982. It hasn’t been that high in the current recession.”  Looking back to the year 1981, budget deficit was worst; there was a looming possibility of a state takeover. Unemployment was in double digit range; police department was cut by 27% and Mayor Young cut thousands of workers from 1974 to 1980.

Facing re-election in 1981, Mayor Coleman Young was unyielding in battling the financial crisis. Reality is, during an election year you don’t make bold leadership decisions like increasing taxes to get rid of a budget deficit. But, that’s exactly what Coleman Young did. So Mayor Young worked with then Governor Milliken to put together a coalition of Democrats and Republicans to provide the votes needed to get the legislature to approve the tax hike. The proposed tax increase raised taxes on residents from 2 percent to 3 percent and on non-residents from .5 percent to 1.5 percent.

Mayor Young then hired Conrad Mallet Jr., former Supreme Court Justice, former chief administrator for the Detroit Medical Center, who is currently a member of Governor Snyder’s financial review team, to lead the campaign advocating for Detroiters to vote in favor of a tax increase. How ironic! But in the end voters approved the tax hike by a 68-32 margin.  Conrad Mallett played a major role in saving Detroit from a state takeover in 1981 and now he sits on the governor’s review team to establish an emergency manager and has been mention as the possible EM.  If Coleman Alexander Young, the first African American Mayor of Detroit was still in office today, he would have made concessions with labor, he would have convinced Detroiters to vote in favor of a tax increase, he would have cussed and fussed until Lansing lawmakers understood what strong leadership is truly about. 

Leonard Flemming, of the Detroit News wrote on the assumptions of who Gov. Snyder might select as Detroit’s Emergency Manager and said “Speculation about who could be named the emergency manager has included former Wayne County Prosecutor Mike Duggan, former state Supreme Court Chief Justice Conrad Mallett, Benton Harbor Emergency Manager Joe Harris and former Washington, D.C., Mayor Anthony Williams, who testified recently before the governor's Detroit financial review team on the merits of a consent agreement for the city.” Mallett, who is on the Detroit review team with state Treasurer Andy Dillon, said he is not interested in the post.

Conrad Mallett was quoted in the Detroit News article saying "If the governor were forced because of a lack of political agreement to put in an emergency manager, the city of Detroit's future would be in severe jeopardy," Mallett said. "The consent agreement is the only solution. It's a very practical response to this very difficult situation. The political leadership of Detroit needs to accept the truth, and the truth is the consent agreement is necessary.” Convincing someone to be the “chief bureaucrat” of Detroit as an emergency manager will be a challenge, as well as finding someone with the "fiscal and political leadership that Detroit requires because it's a very complicated job," Mallett said. It would be tragic" if an agreement isn't reached. "It is precisely because there is such a dearth of candidates available that both for political and practical reasons, an emergency manager will not work," he added. "You cannot have someone come in whose only suitability is their ability to manage a ledger sheet.  Conrad Mallett also commented saying “I have made the determination that that person will fail."

(FYI)
So what exactly is an emergency manager?

Under Michigan law, an emergency manager has the authority to lay off or cut the pay of employees, outsource services, merge and reorganize departments, overturn ordinances, alter the budget, cancel vendor contracts, abandon labor agreements and sell city assets. The City of Detroit has many assets -- such as Belle Isle, the Water and Sewerage Department, a share of the Detroit-Windsor Tunnel and the Coleman A. Young International Airport -- along with tens of thousands of abandoned or unused properties that could be sold or leased.

What happens to Detroit residents if there is an emergency manager?

The main goal of an emergency manager is to continue essential services. That means garbage would still be picked up, water would run and police and firefighters would still protect residents. But so called non-essential services, like recreation centers, special programs and subsidies to cultural institutions like the Detroit Institute of Arts and the Charles H. Wright Museum of African American History, could be reduced or eliminated altogether. It also means the Emergency manager has the power to privatize any and all services at his or her discretion. For instance, the city of Pontiac is currently under an Emergency Manager and has been for the past 3 years. In November of 2011, just days prior to an election Emergency Manager Lou Shimmel privatized the department of elections in Pontiac and fired the city clerk. Needless to say that election process was a disaster. 

What happens to city employees?

Nonunion employees would be in danger of losing their jobs, or having pay or benefits reduced or cut at the will of the emergency manager. In all cities run by an emergency manager, union employees have had to renegotiate contracts and their pay and benefits have been cut.


On our next blog entry we will look closely at the newly signed consent agreement!
Legal Aid and Defender's Association

Twitter: @Legalaidadvancjustice
Facebook: LegalAidAdvancingJustice

Friday, March 23, 2012

"The Social Welfare Act" House Bill 5223

“The Social Welfare Act” House Bill 5223

As part of a national push to require drug testing for people currently receiving public assistance, Michigan is contemplating passing House Bill 5223, entitled the “The Social Welfare Act”.   This bill is an amendment  to current state law that "shall establish a program of substance abuse testing as a condition of eligibility for Family Independence Program assistance benefits,” according to Kenneth Kurtz (R), Chairman of the Families, Children, and Seniors committee.

In Michigan, “The Social Welfare Act” has already been deemed unconstitutional. In 1999 the National ACLU and the ACLU of Michigan challenged the constitutionality of these same efforts in the case Marchwinkski v. Howard, (113 F.Supp.2d 1134).  In this case, Plaintiffs challenged a Michigan law requiring FIA to impose testing for substance abuse as a condition of welfare eligibility.  After several court hearings and an en banc review, six federal court judges upheld the lower court’s ruling that the testing was a violation of Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights because the testing was done without particularized suspicion. 

According to the National League for Human Services “no proposed or current policy in any state has been able to show that drug testing policies save any state dollars.” The legality of random or universal drug testing policy for cash assistance recipients is questionable, and it would behoove the State of Michigan to stay away from such controversial courses of action, as it will once again be challenged and end up in court. Arizona, Missouri, Oklahoma and Georgia have all passed bills to create suspicion-based drug testing policies, though the cost are high and not likely to save states any money. Arizona estimated that it would cost $3.4 million to just do testing for applicants and recipients, Oklahoma assumed a cost of $2.16 million for its program and Missouri expects to spend $1.9 million during FY12 and another $2.2 million in FY13.[i] Not to mention additional cost outside of the actual testing such as the administrative cost of staffing and training, and an increase of administrative hearings have not been taken into account.  Drug Testing.

Many others have said there is a compromise. A family receiving or applying for cash assistance should be given at least two to three months to enroll in a drug treatment program if and only if there is reasonable suspicion that there is a substance abuse problem. Secondly, their participation and progress should be measured as a part of their accomplishments in meeting self sufficiency. Failure to comply with the development toward self-sufficiency should result in grounds for penalty or termination of benefits. Fortunately, this is what the law already stipulates and is established in DHS policy. Prohibiting recipients from assistance, without proper due process, will inhibit those who are having substance abuse issues from getting treatment, as they will be burdened with no money or support, nor have the ability to get access to treatment.  Then no one wins.
Contact Legal Aid
by: Al Williams
[i] ASPE Issue Brief, Drug Testing Welfare Recipients: Recent Proposals and Continuing Controversies, October 2011

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

LANSING LEGISLATORS LOOK TO REVISE THE CRIMINAL DEFENDANT “YOUTHFUL TRAINING ACT”(HYTA)
On December 14th, 2011, Michigan State Senator Bert Johnson introduced Senate Bill 880, which will revise the criminal defendant “youthful trainee status” to increase the age limit from age 21 to age 26 on “youthful trainee status” forcriminal defendants, which provides a mechanism to exclude the offense on the youth’s permanent record. According to Bert Johnson the bill would also establish various conditions for this status, including a full time school, work or community service requirement and more. The new legislation as written contains Sections that will minimize or eliminate judicial discretion by the mandatory requirements relating to tether, costs, and community service. Opposition to the bill are concerned with community service being allowed to be performed for private 501(C)(3) entities.  Community service is also not appropriate forall offenses or offenders.  e.g. sexualor assault related convictions.
See legislation: http://www.michiganvotes.org/Legislation.aspx?ID=142264

Currently,in Michigan, individuals from the age of 17 until their 21st birthday who areconvicted of a crime may be eligible for Holmes Youthful Trainee Act(HYTA) to avoid a public record of conviction. The actual name of thelaw, Holmes Youthful Trainee Act, may conjure up some image of"trainees" in boot-camp, but in truth, there's nothing like that.Currently, a person who has been granted HYTA (also called YTA) by a Court must, at a minimum, be placed on Probation.A Judge cannot order more than 3 years of Probation, but the Judge can also include incarceration as part of its' Sentence. In other words, being granted HTYA status has no effect on whether the Judge sends someone to Jail, although, to be sure, in the vast majority of cases where HYTA is granted, there is no incarceration ordered.
Today, HYTA only applies to people charged with a crime which occurred after their 17th birthday, but before their21st birthday. That age range is inflexible; if someone is charged with a crime that occurred one day before their 17th birthday, or on the very day of their 21st birthday, they are ineligible.
 According to the state legislature, HYTA applies to all kinds of Crimes, not just Drug Possession charges,. There are certain exceptions: Crimes punishable by imprisonment for life (Capitol Offenses), Major Drug Crimes and all Traffic Offenses.
Originally,the reasoning behind this law is the recognition that young people, on occasion,do dumb things. An instance of bad judgment before one has the chance to mature and think like an adult should not necessarily handicap that person for life with a Criminal Record, which can have all kinds of negative consequences forfuture advancement. HYTA is equally applicable to Felonies and Misdemeanors, with the exceptions mentioned above. HYTA status allows a person to prove to the Court that they can stay out of trouble longenough to warrant dismissing the whole case without ever placing it upon their Public Record.